From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:44:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4A6DBD51.6040103@phuk.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Alan Stern Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Oliver Neukum , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 >> Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization >> Submitter : >> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > support it properly. > > Alan Stern > I'm currently working on a patch for laptop_mode. The maintainer tells me there's work going on in the kernel to blacklist USB devices that don't implement autosuspend correctly (like mice turning their light off, etc...). Is that true? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752654AbZG0OyT (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:54:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751567AbZG0OyS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:54:18 -0400 Received: from xdsl-87-78-165-2.netcologne.de ([87.78.165.2]:56512 "EHLO horst.phuk.ath.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbZG0OyS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:54:18 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 578 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:54:17 EDT Message-ID: <4A6DBD51.6040103@phuk.ath.cx> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:44:33 +0200 From: list@phuk.ath.cx User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Stern CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Oliver Neukum , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List Subject: Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 >> Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization >> Submitter : >> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > support it properly. > > Alan Stern > I'm currently working on a patch for laptop_mode. The maintainer tells me there's work going on in the kernel to blacklist USB devices that don't implement autosuspend correctly (like mice turning their light off, etc...). Is that true?