From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: kvm userspace: ksm support Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:30:45 +0300 Message-ID: <4A7016C5.3060201@redhat.com> References: <20090728193959.49cc28b6@woof.woof> <4A6F2A38.30500@codemonkey.ws> <4A6F2C59.8020306@redhat.com> <4A6FA576.6020806@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Izik Eidus , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Justin M. Forbes" , Mark McLoughlin To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34086 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751355AbZG2J0H (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:26:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A6FA576.6020806@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/29/2009 04:27 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > I also think that we could get away with getting rid of any checks for > !sync_mmu() since that was introduced in 2.6.27. People are running kvm on 2.6.18. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function