From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:14:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Add KVM support for Book3s_64 (PPC64) hosts v3 Message-Id: <4A702103.4010609@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <1248453028-49627-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1248453028-49627-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org On 07/28/2009 02:43 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:04 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > >> The way I've done this in the past is to get acks from PPC >> maintainers, >> and then push the patches through Avi. >> >> If a "generic" PPC patch is required by a KVM patch, pushing them >> through different trees would leave KVM broken for weeks until it all >> ends up merged in Linus's tree. >> >> Despite Ben's newfound interest in KVM, I don't see a good reason to >> change this model. :) >> > > Depends how invasive the powerpc bits are. I'll figure something out. > Yes. If they are invasive, the best way is to carry the non-kvm changes in both trees, and for me to push after you (I'll omit the duplicates when pushing). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function