From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: proper name for userspace package? Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:50:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4A71DD73.4090007@redhat.com> References: <4A71CA72.8080106@redhat.com> <20090731.023234.56054455.ryusuke@osrg.net> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090731.023234.56054455.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To: Ryusuke Konishi Cc: Daniel Baumann , users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > (Cc added to Debian maintainer) > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:29:38 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> I'm wondering what the preferred name is for the userspace package. >> >> The tarball is "nilfs-utils" but debian has "nilfs2-tools" - is there a >> preference, or is this a debian convention that caused the rename? >> >> Thanks, >> -Eric > > I don't know the how and why. The btrfs was also packaged with the > "-tools" convention in Debian. On the one hand, we can see all the > convensions like "-utils", "-tools", and "progs" there. > > Personally, I like the "-tools" convension for new ones. > > Regards, > Ryusuke Konishi > Ok, thanks. If it was due to a debian convention, then I may wind up following the Fedora convention (if there is one ;) -Eric