All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpusets: fix deadlock with cpu_down()->cpuset_lock()
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:23:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A725594.8020205@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090730175108.GC3617@redhat.com>

Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/30, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 07/29, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>> I strongly believe the bug does exist, but this patch needs the review
>>>> from maintainers.
>>> Yes...
>>>
>>>> IOW, with this patch migration_call(CPU_DEAD) runs without callback_mutex,
>>>> but kernel/cpuset.c always takes get_online_cpus() before callback_mutex.
>>> Oh. I'm afraid this is not an option.
>>>
>>> callback_mutex should nest under cgroup_mutex, but cpu hotplu pathes
>>> take cgroup_mutex under cpu_hotplug->lock. Lockdep won't be happy.
>>>
>>> Oleg.
>>>
>> We have made great effort to remove get_online_cpus() from cgroup_mutex
>> critical region.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> We can migrate the owner of callback_mutex in migration_call(CPU_DEAD)
>> at first(and then take callback_mutex and migrate others).
> 
> Not sure I understand how can we do this. Even if we know the owner
> of callback_mutex, if we can migrate it safely without callback_mutex
> why we can't migrate other tasks without this lock?

Since we have migrated the owner, we can take callback_mutex to
migrate others ... 

> 
> In any case this doesn't look like a clean solution,

No, it's not a clean solution.

> imho. But I hardly understand what cpuset is,


> can't suggest something clever.

We can add cpuset_lock()/cpuset_unlock() around __stop_machine()
in _cpu_down().

cpuset_lock()
__stop_machine()
	......
	mutex_lock(&lock);
	# It's OK, because we don't require any other lock in this
	# critical region. It's will not cause any kinds of deadlock.
	......
	flush_workqueue(stop_machine_wq);
	# It's OK too. because all work functions(chill(),stop_cpu())
	# of stop_machine_wq don't require any other lock.
	......
	mutex_unlock(&lock);
cpuset_unlock()


This fixes the bug in migrate_call(). Because there is no task which
holds callback_mutex in dead cpu after we add
cpuset_lock()/cpuset_unlock() around __stop_machine() in _cpu_down().

And it helps for your "cpu_hotplug: don't play with current->cpus_allowed"
Am I right?

Lai


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-31  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-29  2:33 + cpu_hotplug-dont-affect-current-tasks-affinity.patch added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-29 21:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-29 21:22   ` [PATCH] cpusets: fix deadlock with cpu_down()->cpuset_lock() Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-29 23:00     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-30  1:53       ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-07-30 17:51         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-31  2:23           ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2009-08-01  4:42             ` [PATCH] cpusets: rework guarantee_online_cpus() to fix deadlock with cpu_down() Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-01  5:34               ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-02  2:18               ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-08-02  6:55                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-04  7:35                   ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-08-04 16:36                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-29 21:42   ` [PATCH 0/1] cpu_hotplug: don't play with current->cpus_allowed Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-29 21:43   ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-30  2:01     ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-07-30 16:32       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A725594.8020205@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.