From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751881AbZHAPRx (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:17:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751764AbZHAPRx (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:17:53 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:44318 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751761AbZHAPRw (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:17:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4A745C9F.7000301@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:17:51 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: Vegard Nossum , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: fix sparse warning References: <1246873983.20908.0.camel@johannes.local> <1248874951.25614.0.camel@johannes.local> In-Reply-To: <1248874951.25614.0.camel@johannes.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 11:53 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >> Whether or not the sparse warning >> >> warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement >> >> is justified or not in this case, it is annoying and >> trivial to fix. > > Whatever happened to this patch? Did you decide to screw sparse > warnings? I thought Vegard applied the patch but I can't see it in kmemcheck.git either. Vegard? Pekka >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg >> --- >> include/linux/kmemcheck.h | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> --- wireless-testing.orig/include/linux/kmemcheck.h 2009-07-06 11:41:16.000000000 +0200 >> +++ wireless-testing/include/linux/kmemcheck.h 2009-07-06 11:41:30.000000000 +0200 >> @@ -137,13 +137,13 @@ static inline void kmemcheck_mark_initia >> int name##_end[0]; >> >> #define kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(ptr, name) \ >> - do if (ptr) { \ >> + do { if (ptr) { \ >> int _n = (long) &((ptr)->name##_end) \ >> - (long) &((ptr)->name##_begin); \ >> BUILD_BUG_ON(_n < 0); \ >> \ >> kmemcheck_mark_initialized(&((ptr)->name##_begin), _n); \ >> - } while (0) >> + } } while (0) >> >> #define kmemcheck_annotate_variable(var) \ >> do { \ >> >