From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233] helo=mgw-mx06.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MYwr6-0006dT-Jm for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:53:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4A7A7E01.90407@nokia.com> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:53:53 +0300 From: Adrian Hunter MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JiSheng Zhang Subject: Re: what's the status of ubifs, stable for product References: <2df346410908052025safd5f51j7174ebe02beb31ff@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2df346410908052025safd5f51j7174ebe02beb31ff@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , JiSheng Zhang wrote: > I read all the doc\faq of ubi and ubifs, I'm reading its source. I have one > question, what's the status of ubifs?Is it stable enough for product? Is > there any products using it? We use it internally and plan to use it on upcoming products. It is certainly stable enough for you to trial its use, but only by testing it on your own product under your own operating conditions can you make a sensible decision on whether it is OK for you.