From: Akshay Lal <alal@cleversafe.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
John Quigley <jquigley@cleversafe.com>
Subject: Re: User specific priorities on for iscsi paths doesn't seem to work
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:28:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7C9C6C.3070204@cleversafe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090807212104.GA1419@redhat.com>
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07 2009 at 5:07pm -0400,
> Akshay Lal <alal@cleversafe.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 07 2009 at 4:25pm -0400,
>>> Akshay Lal <alal@cleversafe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm having a few issues with path priorities. It seems that the
>>>> choice of path to use during I/O is independent of the user defined
>>>> priorities for each path.
>>>>
>>>> I am setting the priorities by executing writing a script that is
>>>> used by prio_callout. This seems to work when I execute multipath
>>>> -ll since all the specified priorities show up correctly. (the
>>>> path_grouping_policy being used is failover)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is there something I'm doing wrong? I would like to be able to define
>>>> the priorities per device, and ensure that data only traverses on
>>>> the lower priority path when
>>>> a) a failure to the first path (path with a higher priority) occures
>>>> b) no other path with a higher priority exists
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Do things behave as you'd like if you change path_grouping_policy to
>>> 'group_by_prio'?
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>> Mike:
>>
>> It seems that if I were to set the path_grouping_policy to
>> "group_by_prio", then it seems to be working similar to a multibus
>> configuration. What I would like is for within a single multipath group,
>> (say mpath1), specify a primary path and an alternate/failover path. If
>> I can make this configurable via user land tool that'd be great. In this
>> vein, I had considered priorities with hope that if I can set the
>> priority of a certain path within a group then the path with the highest
>> priority will always be chosen and the other path (with the lower
>> priority) will only come into play when the primary goes down.
>>
>> Below is the output of the multipath -ll & conf file when setting the
>> path_grouping_policy to group_by_prio.
>>
>>
>> multipath -ll:
>> --------------
>> mpath2 (244534e3833623961) dm-1 DSNET,Dispersed Store
>> [size=47G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
>> \_ round-robin 0 [prio=15][enabled]
>> \_ 85:0:0:0 sdc 8:32 [active][ready]
>> \_ 87:0:0:0 sde 8:64 [active][ready]
>> mpath1 (244534e3266616134) dm-0 DSNET,Dispersed Store
>> [size=47G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
>> \_ round-robin 0 [prio=15][active]
>> \_ 84:0:0:0 sdb 8:16 [active][ready]
>> \_ 86:0:0:0 sdd 8:48 [active][ready]
>>
>>
>> /etc/multipath.conf:
>> --------------------
>> defaults {
>> udev_dir /dev
>> polling_interval 1
>> selector "round-robin 0"
>> path_grouping_policy group_by_prio
>> getuid_callout "/sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n"
>> prio_callout "/bin/bash
>> /root/MultipathScripts/mpath_prio_alt %n"
>> path_checker tur
>> rr_min_io 128
>> max_fds 8192
>> rr_weight priorities
>> failback immediate
>> no_path_retry queue
>> user_friendly_names yes
>> }
>>
>
>
> Please don't top-post.
>
> I'm pretty sure John meant to say "group_by_prio" rather than "failover"
> in his initial reply to this thread. John originally got this insight
> (dummy device section et. al. applies to RHEL 5.3) back in April:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-April/msg00157.html
>
> Which multipath/distro are you using?
>
> Mike
>
I tried out John's approach as well and it still seems to be giving me
the similar results to what I mentioned before, i.e., replicating multibus
Priority list:
--------------
192.168.7.103:3260-iscsi-iqn.2008-07.com.cleversafe:vault-2 5
192.168.7.106:3260-iscsi-iqn.2008-07.com.cleversafe:vault-2 10
192.168.7.103:3260-iscsi-iqn.2008-07.com.cleversafe:vault-1 10
192.168.7.106:3260-iscsi-iqn.2008-07.com.cleversafe:vault-1 5
iSCSI disk associated with iSCSI sessions:
------------------------------------------
Target: iqn.2008-07.com.cleversafe:vault-1
Current Portal: 192.168.7.106:3260,1
Persistent Portal: 192.168.7.106:3260,1
Attached scsi disk sdb State: running
Current Portal: 192.168.7.103:3260,1
Persistent Portal: 192.168.7.103:3260,1
Attached scsi disk sdd State: running
Target: iqn.2008-07.com.cleversafe:vault-2
Current Portal: 192.168.7.106:3260,1
Persistent Portal: 192.168.7.106:3260,1
Attached scsi disk sdc State: running
Current Portal: 192.168.7.103:3260,1
Persistent Portal: 192.168.7.103:3260,1
Attached scsi disk sde State: running
multipath -ll:
---------------
mpath2 (244534e3833623961) dm-1 DSNET,Dispersed Store
[size=47G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=15][enabled]
\_ 85:0:0:0 sdc 8:32 [active][ready]
\_ 87:0:0:0 sde 8:64 [active][ready]
mpath1 (244534e3266616134) dm-0 DSNET,Dispersed Store
[size=47G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=15][enabled]
\_ 84:0:0:0 sdb 8:16 [active][ready]
\_ 86:0:0:0 sdd 8:48 [active][ready]
Versions being used:
dm-multipath: device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-23.el5_3.4
kernel: 2.6.29.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-07 20:25 User specific priorities on for iscsi paths doesn't seem to work Akshay Lal
2009-08-07 20:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-07 21:07 ` Akshay Lal
2009-08-07 21:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-07 21:28 ` Akshay Lal [this message]
2009-08-07 21:31 ` Akshay Lal
2009-08-07 21:50 ` John A. Sullivan III
2009-08-07 20:59 ` John A. Sullivan III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7C9C6C.3070204@cleversafe.com \
--to=alal@cleversafe.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jquigley@cleversafe.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.