From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Simplify calls to cpuid by using + for in/out constraints
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 10:19:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7F0511.6060408@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090808202113.GA21962@feather>
I would prefer to not apply this patch unless there is a good reason.
The existing code isn't broken, and any time we change an asm()
statement we risk triggering bugs in some obscure gcc version.
It isn't, of course, that the proposed change is wrong, but simply that
it is an unnecessary change, and since it involves asm() statements I
would like to reject it for churn reduction reasons. Especially so
since it is "build-tested only".
-hpa
On 08/08/2009 01:21 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> ---
>
> Build-tested only.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 7 +++----
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index c776826..dfa947e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -180,11 +180,10 @@ static inline void native_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
> {
> /* ecx is often an input as well as an output. */
> asm("cpuid"
> - : "=a" (*eax),
> + : "+a" (*eax),
> "=b" (*ebx),
> - "=c" (*ecx),
> - "=d" (*edx)
> - : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx));
> + "+c" (*ecx),
> + "=d" (*edx));
> }
>
> static inline void load_cr3(pgd_t *pgdir)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index 6ee2ef8..6eab164 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -190,11 +190,10 @@ static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int *bx,
> }
>
> asm(XEN_EMULATE_PREFIX "cpuid"
> - : "=a" (*ax),
> + : "+a" (*ax),
> "=b" (*bx),
> - "=c" (*cx),
> - "=d" (*dx)
> - : "0" (*ax), "2" (*cx));
> + "+c" (*cx),
> + "=d" (*dx));
>
> *cx &= maskecx;
> *dx &= maskedx;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-09 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-08 20:21 [PATCH] x86: Simplify calls to cpuid by using + for in/out constraints Josh Triplett
2009-08-09 17:19 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-08-09 18:34 ` Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7F0511.6060408@kernel.org \
--to=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.