From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:05:17 -0500 Message-ID: <4A80291D.6020200@sandeen.net> References: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Sandeen , ext4 development , xfs-oss To: Lachlan McIlroy Return-path: Received: from sandeen.net ([209.173.210.139]:14480 "EHLO mail.sandeen.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754880AbZHJOFN (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:05:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > This looks good Eric. > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota > enforcement too? I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well. -Eric > Lachlan > > ----- "Eric Sandeen" wrote: > >> Add some very basic quota sanity tests for generic filesystems. >> >> This is based on test 108, but uses the generic quota tools, >> not xfs_quota, and therefore cannot test project quota. >> >> Also, the IOs are much smaller (48k) so that ext3 won't get into >> indirect blocks and throw off the accounting. This does >> assume 4k blocks though. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen >> --- ... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7AE4NLD061939 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:04:23 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DBD5C1D562B7 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oBShPzYpVxKY0lMF for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A80291D.6020200@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:05:17 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity References: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: Eric Sandeen , ext4 development , xfs-oss Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > This looks good Eric. > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota > enforcement too? I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well. -Eric > Lachlan > > ----- "Eric Sandeen" wrote: > >> Add some very basic quota sanity tests for generic filesystems. >> >> This is based on test 108, but uses the generic quota tools, >> not xfs_quota, and therefore cannot test project quota. >> >> Also, the IOs are much smaller (48k) so that ext3 won't get into >> indirect blocks and throw off the accounting. This does >> assume 4k blocks though. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen >> --- ... _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs