From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: Can we get "applied" top posted?
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:23:59 -0400
Message-ID: <4A82B45F.5030205@garzik.org>
References: <87f94c370908120504y3ed912f2vde2413d4e9c06eff@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:56083 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751867AbZHLMYA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:24:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87f94c370908120504y3ed912f2vde2413d4e9c06eff@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>

Greg Freemyer wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> I understand the logic for not top posting in general, but I for one
> rarely if ever need context to evaluate "applied".  If I'm going to
> look at a patch, I do it when it is posted, not when it is applied.
> 
> Seeing the subject and then "applied" at the top of the message
> content would allow me to quickly delete the email in most cases.
> 
> It would save me having to scroll through an email just to get to the
> end and see that one word.

Generally I try to cut the patch and leave just the patch description... 
  I'll try more of that.

	Jeff