From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
mangoo@wpkg.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x122/0x13a()
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:04:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A84478F.5010808@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250176905.7289.7.camel@Maple>
John Dykstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 16:00 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> BTW, I've seen the same issue in 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 while doing a bunch
>> of NFS-over-UDP testing. I've seen the issue reported in 2.6.27 as well,
>> but it went by ignored. It's not easy to reproduce as it seems like it
>> requires quite a bit traffic over over multiple interfaces.
>
> I've been unable to reproduce it so far. Has bonding always been
> present in the cases you've seen, or are multiple independent interfaces
> sufficient?
Bonding wasn't used in this case, ie. no bonding interfaces were configured.
>
> In the case you reported initially, openvpn was using UDP, but the peer
> was dead, so there presumably wasn't much traffic from that app. Was
> there lots of NFS-over-UDP traffic also going on?
The openvpn case wasn't mine. I didn't use any vpn traffic. Just 2
systems back-to-back with NFS traffic between them.
Yes, there was a lot of NFS over UDP traffic and not much other UDP traffic.
>
> Where was the independent report on 2.6.27
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/22887
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2008/11/26/4244994
-vlad
>
> -- John
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-03 8:30 WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x122/0x13a() Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-08-04 0:38 ` John Dykstra
2009-08-04 4:20 ` David Miller
2009-08-04 6:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-12 20:00 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-08-13 15:21 ` John Dykstra
2009-08-13 17:04 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2009-08-13 18:16 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-08-04 20:04 ` John Dykstra
2009-08-04 20:35 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-03 8:27 Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A84478F.5010808@hp.com \
--to=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=john.dykstra1@gmail.com \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.