From: John Quigley <jquigley@jquigley.com>
To: XFS Development <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: XFS corruption with failover
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:06:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A84B88A.4070701@jquigley.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A84B050.4020500@sandeen.net>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Are you sure?
>
> if (ohead->oh_clientid != XFS_TRANSACTION &&
> ohead->oh_clientid != XFS_LOG) {
> xlog_warn(
> "XFS: xlog_recover_process_data: bad clientid");
> ASSERT(0);
> return (XFS_ERROR(EIO));
> }
>
> so it does say EIO but that seems to me to be the wrong error; loks more
> like a bad log to me.
Hey Eric:
That would certainly be consistent with our experience, as the only way we're able to bring the file system back online is by zeroing the log.
> It does make me wonder if there's any sort of per-initiator caching on
> the iscsi target or something. </handwave>
There isn't, as mentioned above, though we have several intermediate layers between the file system and iSCSI initiator, including multipath and LVM, both of which I was initially suspicious of. In testing with a similar scenario but in a more isolate fashion without those two intermediates, the behavior was still present. Also, just to clarify the topology:
/-----[Failover Secondary]------\
/ \
NFS Client ----/ \-----[ISCSI Target]----[Distributed Storage]
\ /
\ /
\-----[Failover Primary]--------/
Those two failover machines, Primary and Secondary, act as the NFS server, the XFS mountpoint and ISCSI initiator. Only one failover machine is logged into the ISCSI target/has XFS mounted.
Thanks very much for your cycles on this guys.
- John Quigley
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-14 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-13 20:17 XFS corruption with failover John Quigley
2009-08-13 21:17 ` Emmanuel Florac
2009-08-13 22:42 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-14 0:52 ` John Quigley
2009-08-14 0:50 ` John Quigley
2009-08-13 21:44 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-14 0:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-14 0:58 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-14 1:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-14 1:44 ` John Quigley
2009-08-14 1:06 ` John Quigley [this message]
2009-08-14 13:21 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-14 0:56 ` John Quigley
[not found] <424153067.1934481250210293891.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-14 0:38 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-14 1:14 ` John Quigley
2009-08-17 18:04 ` John Quigley
[not found] <835473717.1935811250214078456.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-14 1:43 ` Lachlan McIlroy
[not found] <990461759.2142271250648177725.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-19 2:18 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-19 15:46 ` John Quigley
[not found] <1194138654.75921250838215929.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-08-21 7:11 ` Lachlan McIlroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A84B88A.4070701@jquigley.com \
--to=jquigley@jquigley.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.