From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: [XCI] Mesa build problem Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:10:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4A85460C.7060406@eu.citrix.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Daniel Barden Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Daniel Barden wrote: > Hi, > > While building Mesa library in Xenclient, I got the following > problems: > > touch > depend > > makedepend -I > -I/home/dbarden/work/XCI/build_i686/staging_dir/usr/include/linux > -fdepend -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include/GL/internal > -I../../../src/mesa/main -I../../../src/mesa/glapi `pkg-config > --cflags libdrm` glcontextmodes.c clientattrib.c compsize.c eval.c > glxcmds.c glxcurrent.c glxext.c glxextensions.c indirect.c > indirect_init.c indirect_size.c indirect_window_pos.c > indirect_texture_compression.c indirect_transpose_matrix.c > indirect_vertex_array.c indirect_vertex_program.c pixel.c pixelstore.c > render2.c renderpix.c single2.c singlepix.c vertarr.c xfont.c > glx_pbuffer.c glx_query.c drisw_glx.c dri_common.c dri_glx.c XF86dri.c > glxhash.c > \ > > ../../../src/mesa/main/dispatch.c > ../../../src/mesa/glapi/glapi.c ../../../src/mesa/glapi/glthread.c > ../../../src/mesa/x86/glapi_x86.S > > makedepend: warning: glcontextmodes.c (reading > /usr/include/sys/types.h, line 147): cannot find include file > "stddef.h" > not in > -I/home/dbarden/work/XCI/build_i686/staging_dir/usr/include/linux/stddef.h > > not in > ./stddef.h > > not in ../../../include/stddef.h > > In the makedepend line, there is a -I without any directory, that > causes the next -I to be considered a directory. Does any of you have > the same problem? I'm afraid nobody actually needed mesa in dom0 in the first place, but you could try newer buildroot, to see if the compilation actually worked there, and tell us; or even better, send backporting patches ;) -- Vincent