From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [67.222.39.32] (helo=outbound-mail-152.bluehost.com) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MbySN-0001fX-4v for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:12:39 +0200 Received: (qmail 9074 invoked by uid 0); 14 Aug 2009 14:56:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host285.hostmonster.com) (74.220.215.85) by outboundproxy5.bluehost.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 14:56:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=linuxbj.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=GOqDUDGk7yyT/73oHvFc1A4CNm0kMEDooAzpNew1c8mDMUZ9L/DzVeLQhgo3WGermOx9OUPQRI7m48ItjPZRWd4gnK9LQC2yItBbK6/10B0GD1Ua0+7W6FGmsMW5C2cf; Received: from [222.131.143.214] (helo=[192.168.200.199]) by host285.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MbyCF-0003e6-Er for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:56:00 -0600 Message-ID: <4A857AFC.5040509@linuxbj.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:55:56 +0800 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWluZyBDaG93IOWRqOaYjg==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4A84650F.1080902@linuxbj.com> <200908140406.00714.holger+oe@freyther.de> <4A850430.6060809@linuxbj.com> In-Reply-To: X-Identified-User: {2055:host285.hostmonster.com:linuxbjc:linuxbj.com} {sentby:smtp auth 222.131.143.214 authed with chow.ming@linuxbj.com} Subject: Re: patch for compcache recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:12:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Got it, thank you. I will try the checksum stuff. Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Ming Chow 周明 wrote: > >> BTW. I had experienced some checksum mismatch before. A few packages >> which just work can not pass checksum matching. I guess it may be caused >> by hosting or tarball changing without notice. For I am not very clear >> how the global checksum.ini is maintained. I lazily set >> OE_ALLOW_INSECURE_DOWNLOADS. >> > > Take a look at > http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Dealing_with_checksum_mismatch > > Let us know about the packages failing the checksum test so we can fix > things. > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >