From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Current xen-unstable xen crashing in boot Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:02:49 -0700 Message-ID: <4A85D0F9.1080802@goop.org> References: <4A85B8D0.7090206@goop.org> <4A85CDA0.2010905@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A85CDA0.2010905@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Xen-devel , Wei Gang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/14/09 13:48, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> (XEN) Early fatal page fault at e008:ffff828c8015415c (cr2=3Dffff83007= fc75008, ec=3D0000) >> (XEN) Stack dump: 000000000007fc76 000000000000000c ffff83007fc77ff0 f= fff83007fc76000 ffff828c8026fe58 0000000000000262 0000000000000020 018000= 0000000000 000000000000010c ffff828c802a6380 ffff83007fc75008 00000000000= 00001 ffff830000000000 ffff828c80219b0c ffff83007fc76000 0000000000000000= ffff828c8015415c 000000000000e008 0000000000010082 ffff828c8026fdd8 0000= 000000000000 ffff828c80154158 ffff828c8026fde8 0000000000000262 000000000= 00002e2 0000000000000086 0000000000000262 0000000000000000 000000008026fe= 18 ffff83007fc75008 ffff828c00000027 ffff83007fc76000 ffff828c8021dd60 00= 00000000000002 000000007fc42000 ffff83000008bfc0 ffff83000008bf40 0000000= 000002000 ffff828c8026fe68 ffff828c80154f85 ffff828c8026fe78 ffff828c8015= 4fa5 ffff828c8026ff18 ffff828c802343ef 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 = 0000000000a1e000 0000000000aca3e0 ffff83000008bf40 0000000000000000 00000= 000ffffffff ffff83000000000c 0000000800000000 000000010000006e 0000000000= 000003 00000000000002f8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000000= 0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000067e8c fff= f828c801000b5 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000= 00000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000= 000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0= 000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000= 0000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000000= 00000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000= 0000000000000000 00000000fffff000=20 >> >> This appears to be: >> (gdb) x/i 0xffff828c8015415c=20 >> 0xffff828c8015415c : mov (%rax),%rax >> (gdb) x/i 0xffff828c80154f85=20 >> 0xffff828c80154f85 <__memguard_change_range+237>: leaveq=20 >> >> but I can't find a good enclosing frame from there (is there a tool to= pretty-print these stack traces?). >> =20 >> =20 > > I bisected it down to: > > The first bad revision is: > changeset: 20038:1197585e32b7 > user: Keir Fraser > date: Fri Aug 07 17:29:50 2009 +0100 > summary: x86: Increase default max CPUs to 64. > =20 Reverting this change on current tip works fine for me. J