From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] /dev/dm-* or /dev/mapper/*
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 20:30:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A88B2A9.2060202@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250467733.18434.1330126635@webmail.messagingengine.com>
On 2009-08-16 19:08, Edward Siefker wrote:
> I originally set up raid-luks-lvm on this machine with debian's
> installer tool, now I am trying to add another encrypted raid1 device to
> the existing volume group. I already have the raid device set up and
> encrypted, that's no problem. Now the linux gazette
> (http://linuxgazette.net/140/pfeiffer.html) tells me I should run
> 'pvcreate' on the device in /dev/mapper. However, if I examine my
> existing physical volumes with 'pvscan' I get the following:
>
> iblis:/home/hatta# pvscan
> PV /dev/dm-0 VG iblis-volumes lvm2 [931.32 GB / 0 free]
> Total: 1 [931.32 GB] / in use: 1 [931.32 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ]
>
> Apparently I am using /dev/dm-0 instead of /dev/mapper/md1_crypt. I
> wondered if these were maybe two names for the same thing, so I checked
> ls:
>
> iblis:/home/hatta# ls -ld /dev/dm-0 /dev/mapper/md1_crypt
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 0 2009-08-16 12:02 /dev/dm-0
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 0 2009-08-16 12:02 /dev/mapper/md1_crypt
>
> Same major and minor number, if that means anything. Next I ran
> 'dmcrypt info' on each:
>
> iblis:/home/hatta# dmsetup info /dev/dm-0
> Device /dev/dm-0 not found
> Command failed
> iblis:/home/hatta# dmsetup info /dev/mapper/md1_crypt
> Name: md1_crypt
> State: ACTIVE
> Read Ahead: 256
> Tables present: LIVE
> Open count: 7
> Event number: 0
> Major, minor: 253, 0
> Number of targets: 1
>
>
> It works on one, and not the other. So they're not the same thing. My
> new device 'md2_crypt' corresponds to /dev/dm-8, if I am to trust the
> major/minor numbers. Should I run pvcreate on /dev/dm-8 or
> /dev/mapper/md2_crypt?
/dev/dm-* device names seem to go in sequence of when they are
discovered at boot time, or order in the config file, or some other
such algorithm who's input changes as LVs are added and destroyed.
You know, though, that md1_crypt will always be md1_crypt no matter
what you do to any other LVs.
I'd run interactive commands against dm-8, but would refer to
md2_crypt in any scripts that I write which need to work tomorrow,
next week, etc.
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-17 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 0:08 [linux-lvm] /dev/dm-* or /dev/mapper/* Edward Siefker
2009-08-17 1:30 ` Ron Johnson [this message]
2009-08-17 8:48 ` Peter Rajnoha
2009-08-17 9:01 ` Peter Rajnoha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A88B2A9.2060202@cox.net \
--to=ron.l.johnson@cox.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.