From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755961AbZHQPKF (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:10:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755821AbZHQPKD (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:10:03 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.211.173]:49449 "EHLO mail-yw0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751595AbZHQPKB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:10:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=bzkRHKwIDJR5cNWQAWD9X9cP/xEviB4gDfrE5LBdMdRoCvvATETAWSD9d0js4wTu7e Y/XNiExLtHu7uZWofK3qE7oVWRs69USslo88qsTbjjOtJH6Zf0YPZEonNHILv/aYkvoA n4yA6Kzxjd6tfyfVbWIbDlBUmzvw2WqKlMxPM= Message-ID: <4A8972C3.30202@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:09:55 -0400 From: Gregory Haskins User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avi Kivity CC: Ingo Molnar , Gregory Haskins , kvm@vger.kernel.org, alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects References: <20090814154125.26116.70709.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090814154308.26116.46980.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090815103243.GA26749@elte.hu> <4A87C3B9.2040206@redhat.com> <4A896648.9040707@gmail.com> <4A897057.2050504@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4A897057.2050504@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5D1C9FC22B74CCB11FD17802" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5D1C9FC22B74CCB11FD17802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/17/2009 05:16 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote: >>> My opinion is that this is a duplication of effort and we'd be better= >>> off if everyone contributed to enhancing virtio, which already has >>> widely deployed guest drivers and non-Linux guest support. >>> >>> It may have merit if it is proven that it is technically superior to >>> virtio (and I don't mean some benchmark in some point in time; I mean= >>> design wise). So far I haven't seen any indications that it is. >>> >>> =20 >> >> The design is very different, so hopefully I can start to convince you= >> why it might be interesting. >> =20 >=20 > We've been through this before I believe. If you can point out specifi= c > differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear > (and steal) them though. >=20 You sure know how to convince someone to collaborate with you, eh? Unforunately, i've answered that question numerous times, but it apparently falls on deaf ears. -Greg --------------enig5D1C9FC22B74CCB11FD17802 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqJcsMACgkQP5K2CMvXmqH2BgCdHRUTnVSa1G+FASCawIMlfhTh YYkAoInFhI1++cCJkdg5I0ylK5AAKTcG =nsqJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5D1C9FC22B74CCB11FD17802--