From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756083AbZHQPSd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:18:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756080AbZHQPSd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:18:33 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47626 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755351AbZHQPSc (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:18:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4A8974B0.8050604@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:18:08 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Haskins CC: Ingo Molnar , Gregory Haskins , kvm@vger.kernel.org, alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects References: <20090814154125.26116.70709.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090814154308.26116.46980.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090815103243.GA26749@elte.hu> <4A87C3B9.2040206@redhat.com> <4A896648.9040707@gmail.com> <4A897057.2050504@redhat.com> <4A8972C3.30202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A8972C3.30202@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/17/2009 06:09 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote: > >> We've been through this before I believe. If you can point out specific >> differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear >> (and steal) them though. >> >> > You sure know how to convince someone to collaborate with you, eh? > > If I've offended you, I apologize. > Unforunately, i've answered that question numerous times, but it > apparently falls on deaf ears. > Well, I'm sorry, I truly don't think I've had that question answered with specificity. I'm really interested in it (out of a selfish desire to improve virtio), but the only comment I recall from you was to the effect that the virtio rings were better than ioq in terms of cache placement. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function