From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Robinson Subject: Re: max number of devices in raid6 array Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:09:17 +0100 Message-ID: <4A8980AD.8000407@anonymous.org.uk> References: <20090812090600.GF21118@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <55226.78.86.108.203.1250069920.squirrel@www.yuiop.co.uk> <20090812121911.GG21118@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <87ab259j8m.fsf@frosties.localdomain> <60099.78.86.108.203.1250094780.squirrel@www.yuiop.co.uk> <87zla44e9a.fsf@frosties.localdomain> <4A89801F.5050907@anonymous.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A89801F.5050907@anonymous.org.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linux RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 17/08/2009 17:06, John Robinson wrote: [...] > graph of hard drive capacity vs rebuilds before data loss in a 7-drive > RAID-5 with 512-byte sectors, showing about 450 rebuilds for 36G drives > but only 10 for 1.5T drives. See page 9: > http://www.idema.org/_smartsite/modules/local/data_file/show_file.php?cmd=download&data_file_id=1779 Page 7 actually. Cheers, John.