From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Reimar Döffinger" <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Simplify cpu_synchronize_state()
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:51:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8A5D90.8080700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090817205226.GA13129@1und1.de>
On 08/17/2009 11:52 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:19:53PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
>> index f669c3a..15c30d4 100644
>> --- a/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct KVMState
>> KVMSlot slots[32];
>> int fd;
>> int vmfd;
>> + int regs_modified;
>> int coalesced_mmio;
>> int broken_set_mem_region;
>> int migration_log;
>>
> I think regs_modified is a really bad name since it has nothing at all
> to do with whether the registers were modified.
> IMO it actually indicates if the register copy in the KVM or in CPUState
> is valid.
> So maybe cpustate_regs_valid is a more straight-forward name? (implying
> that when the cpustate regs are valid, the kvm ones probably aren't -
> though the way qemu access registers we can't know).
>
I'm fine with such a change.
> One disadvantage is that code that only needs to read registers will now
> uselessly do kvm_arch_put_registers.
> A fancy way to do it would be to add a "mode" flag indicating if we only
> want read or read-write access to registers, but since we can't enforce
> that it might be a bad idea.
>
This is so rare it's pointless to optimize.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-18 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 20:19 [PATCH] kvm: Simplify cpu_synchronize_state() Avi Kivity
2009-08-17 20:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2009-08-17 20:52 ` Reimar Döffinger
2009-08-18 7:51 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A8A5D90.8080700@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.