From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: pvops dom0 work roadmap Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:12:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4A8B0B1A.80406@goop.org> References: <4A8AF65A.2040904@goop.org> <20090818200718.GD19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090818200718.GD19938@edu.joroinen.fi> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/18/09 13:07, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > I just built and booted the latest 2.6.31-rc6 based tree on Xen 3.4.1. > I'm using 32bit PAE dom0 (and Xen) as usual. > > Seems to work. I'll play some more with it tomorrow, install new guests= etc. > =20 Thanks, >> It would also useful to do regression testing on plain, unpatched, >> mainline, to make sure that any real bugfixes get merged promptly. >> >> =20 > Same kernel also booted OK on baremetal without Xen. > =20 That's useful to know, but I was referring to testing release 2.6.30.x kernels as well, just to make sure they still work. J