All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: Less strict requirements for video device detection (v2)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:00:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8E7022.8000707@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250817458.17853.141.camel@rzhang-dt>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1923 bytes --]

Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:14 +0800, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> Hardware: Acer 6920G (from a bug report)
>>
>> Another case of a broken BIOS. In this case there are several definitions for 
>> video bus devices but only one has _DOS and _DOD defined. All other definitions 
>> only have _DOD.
> 
> I have seen such kind of BIOS too.
> 
>> In the past (2.6.27) _ADR was not evaluated to make sure of using a present 
>> video device, but with that bug brightness could be changed.
>>
>> Now the video bus having _DOS and _DOD is detected as not being present. The 
>> other definitions are not considered because they are lacking the _DOS method.
>> Using the attached patch, would cause the detection code to consider the other 
>> definitions and has been tested to enable backlight control.
>>
> 
>> Would this be an acceptable approach?
> 
> I think so. I generated a similar patch before, but didn't sent it out
> for some reason.
> My suggestion is that we should also print out a warning message if _DOS
> is missed, what do you think?

Some indication about the problem can't hurt. Probably not in 
acpi_is_video_device as that would trigger for even unused devices.
So I added a warning to acpi_video_bus_check for the case when _DOS is missing. 
The case of _DOS being present but _DOD not might also be worth a warning but 
(though the check in acpi_is_video_device prevented this) would have been 
accepted by the current code.

-Stefan

> thanks,
> rui
> 
>>  From the ACPI spec it rather sounds like 
>> _DOD and _DOS must be present for a device for display switching and _DOS would 
>> indicate possible backlight control as well. So the question might not be so 
>> much is it the right thing than is it safe enough to allow more compatibility 
>> with broken implementations without causing other problems...
>>
>> -Stefan
>>
> 


-- 

When all other means of communication fail, try words!



[-- Attachment #2: 0001-acpi-video-Loosen-strictness-of-video-bus-detectio.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1994 bytes --]

>From 6b483015524f67dee3ae2f08f3c0cef27c9d84c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:03:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] acpi: video: Loosen strictness of video bus detection code

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333386

Currently a video bus device must (beside other criteria) define _DOD and
_DOS methods to be considered a video device.
Some broken BIOSes prevented working backlight control by only defining both
for one (non-existing bus) and only _DOD for the rest. With this patch in
place the other bus definitions were considered too and backlight control
started to work again.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/video.c        |    7 ++++++-
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
index 8851315..acd4636 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -1083,7 +1083,12 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_check(struct acpi_video_bus *video)
 	 */
 
 	/* Does this device support video switching? */
-	if (video->cap._DOS) {
+	if (video->cap._DOS || video->cap._DOD) {
+		if (!video->cap._DOS) {
+			printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
+				"BIOS bug: %s declares _DOD but not _DOS\n",
+				acpi_device_bid(video->device));
+		}
 		video->flags.multihead = 1;
 		status = 0;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 7cd2b63..bee5e34 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ long acpi_is_video_device(struct acpi_device *device)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Does this device able to support video switching ? */
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_DOD", &h_dummy)) &&
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_DOD", &h_dummy)) ||
 	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_DOS", &h_dummy)))
 		video_caps |= ACPI_VIDEO_OUTPUT_SWITCHING;
 
-- 
1.5.4.3


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-21 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-20  9:14 Less strict requirements for video device detection Stefan Bader
2009-08-21  1:17 ` Zhang Rui
2009-08-21 10:00   ` Stefan Bader [this message]
2009-08-24  1:19     ` Less strict requirements for video device detection (v2) Zhang Rui
2009-08-24 14:44       ` Less strict requirements for video device detection (v3) Stefan Bader
2009-08-25  1:08         ` Zhang Rui
2009-09-30 20:23           ` Stefan Bader
2009-10-09  1:30             ` Zhang Rui
2009-10-13  6:52               ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A8E7022.8000707@canonical.com \
    --to=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.