From: Felix Radensky <felix@embedded-sol.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Incorrect CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN on MPC85xx boards
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:44:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A910F8A.7070803@embedded-sol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15441F0C-BCE7-4490-8DB5-138E8E1359C7@kernel.crashing.org>
Hi, Kumar
I don't see any immediate problem with current FSL definitions
except they are confusing.
I think my proposal will not work on platforms like MPC8572,
MPC8536, and P2020DS where TEXT_BASE is defined as
0xeff80000 instead of 0xfff80000. Can you please explain the
reason why TEXT_BASE defined differently for these boards.
Thanks.
Felix.
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Felix Radensky wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> All FSL MPC85xx boards define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN as 256K
>> although actual size of u-boot binary is 512K. XES Xpedite boards
>> seem to do
>> the right thing.
>>
>> I was wandering whether CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN for 85xx boards
>> can be defined in terms of CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE, similar to AMCC
>> boards ?
>>
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN (0xFFFFFFFF -
>> CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE + 1)
>
> I don't have any issue w/such a fix but would like to know what the
> implication is of having thing set the way we do on the FSL boards.
> Is there some bug we'd hit?
I don't think there's some bug
>
> - k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-23 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 10:49 [U-Boot] Incorrect CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN on MPC85xx boards Felix Radensky
2009-08-20 13:20 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-23 9:44 ` Felix Radensky [this message]
2009-08-24 14:52 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-24 15:10 ` Felix Radensky
2009-08-24 15:14 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-24 15:34 ` Felix Radensky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A910F8A.7070803@embedded-sol.com \
--to=felix@embedded-sol.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.