From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Tyser Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:39:50 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] omap: move TI's boards to board/ti/ In-Reply-To: <4A9165AF.6050705@googlemail.com> References: <1251037960-17063-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <4A9165AF.6050705@googlemail.com> Message-ID: <4A917EE6.5080108@xes-inc.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Dirk, > Third, I don't like the mixing of board and vendor name as directory > names. It seems to me that where you think you know the vendor, you > use the vendor name, and where you seem to not know it, you use the > board name. So, to be consistent, and to overcome vendor name issue > above, I'd like to use the board name everywhere. That is: Jean-Christophe's patches seem to follow the current U-Boot convention - use board/ when a vendor has multiple boards, and use board/ when a vendor only has 1 board. I can't speak to the accuracy of how he split boards up, but his idea seems correct. > board/beagle/ > board/omap3evm/ > board/omap1510inn/ > ... > board/omap5912osk/ > ... > board/omap2420h4/ > ... > board/zoom1/ > board/zoom2/ > board/overo/ > board/pandora/ > ... This isn't in line with how U-Boot currently organizes the board/ directory. > To improve this even more, something like this would be nice: > > board/omap3beagle/ > board/omap3evm/ > board/omap1innovator/ > ... > board/omap1osk/ > ... > board/omap2h4/ > ... > board/omap3zoom1/ > board/omap3zoom2/ > board/omap3overo/ > board/omap3pandora/ > ... Neither is this. Jean-Christophe seems to be doing the "right" thing with his patches and I'd ACK them assuming the boards are put in the proper board/ and board/ directory. Best, Peter