All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] sched: fully ignore RT tasks for CFS load-balancing
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:52:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A958480.3070207@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251297875.18584.5.camel@twins>

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Since -rt runs IRQs and SoftIRQs as RT tasks and load-balancing is done
> from softirq context, there is always at least one RT task (and very
> likely multiple) running when we balance.
> 
> The current (and totally broken) interaction between RT tasks and CFS
> load-balancing makes it so that we'll try to evacuate a significant
> amount of tasks due to RT tasks being runnable.
> 
> Solve this in another broken way by not accounting RT tasks at all.
> 
> This will likely break another class of cases, but until we can properly
> fix this, we might as well do this.

Peter,

Do we know why this became a problem lately?  I don't recall seeing load 
balancing issues like this way back around 2.6.21 or 22 when CFS was 
released.  Is the cpu_load stuff fairly recent?

--
Darren

> 
> Chucked-on-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_rt.c |    4 ----
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index adcbc68..385d31f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -926,8 +926,6 @@ static void enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p, int wakeup)
> 
>  	if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
>  		enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> -
> -	inc_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
>  }
> 
>  static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> sleep)
> @@ -942,8 +940,6 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> task_struct *p, int sleep)
>  	dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
> 
>  	dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> -
> -	dec_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
>  }
> 
>  /*
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-26 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-26 14:44 [RFC][PATCH -rt] sched: fully ignore RT tasks for CFS load-balancing Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-26 18:52 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2009-08-26 19:04   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A958480.3070207@us.ibm.com \
    --to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.