From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] cldcli: permit (much) longer messages
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:39:35 -0400
Message-ID: <4A96E0F7.6070909@garzik.org>
References: <20090827122702.4f13193e@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090827122702.4f13193e@redhat.com>
Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <hail-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Cc: Project Hail List <hail-devel@vger.kernel.org>

On 08/27/2009 02:27 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> A thought just occured to me that it's dumb to expand the message
> itself when you can expand the format. This way all the potentially
> long things like CLD pathnames do not count against your stack
> and there's essentially no chance to get any messages truncated.
>
> The first snprintf is actually a strncat, but it's more concise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev<zaitcev@redhat.com>

applied