From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "wilbur.chan" <wilbur512@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:35:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A98317B.6050805@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e997b7420908250909k74208353v81240eebd3d0896a@mail.gmail.com>
wilbur.chan wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Wilbur,
> Recently I've implemented non-SMP kexec on MPC8572 and P2020ds(2G ram).
>
>
>
> I modified your
>
> misc_32.S that , I setuped two '1G' entries after the "rfi"
> instruction, so that I did
> not need to setup mapping for instruction address.
If you send some patches I could add them to my tree so we have
everything together.
> As for SMP supporting,I tried to close one of the CPUs in
> default_machine_kexec,
>
> and found that , when cpu1 closed ,and if the second kernel is NON-
>
> SMP,everything went well.so I added some code in
>
> kexec-tools, to make sure the 'kexec' process was running on CPU 0.
I remember that ppc64 had some code to suspend and start the second CPU in
the purgatory code. Not sure if there is a generic way for this on ppc32
or it is a book-e thing. Haven't look at it (yet).
> So, there left one problem, I can not start the second SMP-kernel,
> even if I closed
>
> CPU1. Any suggestions?
The interesting thing is where do you hang/crash. It could be possible
that the kernel is waiting for the non-boot cpus to show up and it
doesn't. Have you look how u-boot prepares the cpus and how kernel
disables them on shutdown?
> PTW:
>
> no-smp ---> no-smp.........OK
> no-smp --->smp...............OK
Does this mean your smp kernel has more that one CPU or just one?
> smp(with cpu1 closed)---->no-smp..............OK
> smpw(with cpu1 closed)---->smp ................FAILED
>
>
> regards,
>
> wilbur
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-02 1:25 Re:[PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E wilbur.chan
2009-08-04 19:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2009-08-25 16:09 ` wilbur.chan
2009-08-28 19:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2009-09-06 14:27 ` [PATCH " wilbur.chan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-03 20:01 Add kexec support for fsl-book-e [V2] Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-11-03 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A98317B.6050805@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=wilbur512@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.