From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, benjamin.thery@bull.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netns: embed ip6_dst_ops directly
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:27:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A998F1D.2050705@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090829113449.GA3067@x200.localdomain>
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> struct net::ipv6.ip6_dst_ops is separatedly dynamically allocated,
> but there is no fundamental reason for it. Embed it directly into
> struct netns_ipv6.
>
> For that:
> * move struct dst_ops into separate header to fix circular dependencies
> I honestly tried not to, it's pretty impossible to do other way
> * drop dynamical allocation, allocate together with netns
>
> For a change, remove struct dst_ops::dst_net, it's deducible
> by using container_of() given dst_ops pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> include/net/dst.h | 23 +----------------------
> include/net/dst_ops.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/net/netns/ipv6.h | 3 ++-
> net/ipv6/route.c | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/net/dst.h
> +++ b/include/net/dst.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #ifndef _NET_DST_H
> #define _NET_DST_H
>
> +#include <net/dst_ops.h>
> #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> @@ -102,28 +103,6 @@ struct dst_entry
> };
> };
>
> -
> -struct dst_ops
> -{
> - unsigned short family;
> - __be16 protocol;
> - unsigned gc_thresh;
> -
> - int (*gc)(struct dst_ops *ops);
> - struct dst_entry * (*check)(struct dst_entry *, __u32 cookie);
> - void (*destroy)(struct dst_entry *);
> - void (*ifdown)(struct dst_entry *,
> - struct net_device *dev, int how);
> - struct dst_entry * (*negative_advice)(struct dst_entry *);
> - void (*link_failure)(struct sk_buff *);
> - void (*update_pmtu)(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 mtu);
> - int (*local_out)(struct sk_buff *skb);
> -
> - atomic_t entries;
> - struct kmem_cache *kmem_cachep;
> - struct net *dst_net;
> -};
You will lose entries, kmem_cachep and gc_thresh per namespace, no ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-29 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-29 11:34 [PATCH] netns: embed ip6_dst_ops directly Alexey Dobriyan
2009-08-29 20:27 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2009-09-02 0:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A998F1D.2050705@fr.ibm.com \
--to=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.