From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:50:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9B72B1.2040908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090831063648.GB5005@ff.dom.local>
Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:26:43AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
>>> After recent changes sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends
>>> on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in some
>>> cases sk_free() is called earlier, usually after other alloc errors.
>>> This patch fixes it by exporting and using __sk_free() directly.
> ...
>> Very nice catch Jarek, but dont you think it would be cleaner to make sure
>> we can call sk_free() right after sk_alloc() instead, and not exporting
>> __sk_free() ?
>>
>> ie initialize wmem_alloc in sk_alloc() instead of initializing it in
>> sock_init_data() ?
>>
>
> Most probably it should be better. But I meant this fix for -net and
> didn't wan't to break too much... So, if you're sure it's OK feel free
> to send your version. (Or it could be changed like this in the -next.)
Well, patch is yours, not mine, and I am confident it is OK.
We should check that no sk_alloc() user did a blind memset() or something
strange like that, before calling sock_init_data() or sk_free()
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index bbb25be..7633422 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1025,6 +1025,7 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority,
sk->sk_prot = sk->sk_prot_creator = prot;
sock_lock_init(sk);
sock_net_set(sk, get_net(net));
+ atomic_set(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
}
return sk;
@@ -1872,7 +1873,6 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk)
*/
smp_wmb();
atomic_set(&sk->sk_refcnt, 1);
- atomic_set(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
atomic_set(&sk->sk_drops, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_init_data);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-31 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-30 22:23 [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 6:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-31 6:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 6:50 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-08-31 7:07 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 7:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-31 7:25 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 9:15 ` [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() Eric Dumazet
2009-08-31 9:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-31 12:02 ` David Miller
2009-08-31 12:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-02 0:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9B72B1.2040908@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.