From: Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Dong-Jae Kang <baramsori72-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: ioband-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
corsetproject-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Test Result] I/O bandwidth Control by dm-ioband - partition-based environment
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:40:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9BFCFD.6080702@ds.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2891419e0908310016k7aa8acc6o548c1ce5a31ba2ba-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Hello Dong-Jae,
Dong-Jae Kang wrote, on 08/31/2009 03:16 AM:
> Hi Munehiro Ikeda
> Thanks for your attention.
> and sorry for late reply.
No problem.
> 2009/8/29 Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org
> <mailto:m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>>
>
> Hello Dong-Jae,
>
> Dong-Jae Kang wrote, on 08/26/2009 09:46 PM:
>
> Hi Ryo
>
> I attached new test result
> file(ioband-partition-based-evaluation.xls)in
> this mail.
> In this time, it is not virtualization environment.
> I evaluated partition-based use cases before I do it in
> vitualization
> environment.
> because I think the two cases are smilar each other.
>
> The detailed information about the evaluation can be referred in
> attached
> file.
>
> If you have any questions or comments after examine it,
> please give me your opinion.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Good work.
> Please let me ask silly questions.
>
> (1) About what "target" means
> I guess "device" means writing to device files directly
> (--filename=/dev/mapper/ioband1)
> and "directory" means mounting these device files and writing to
> some directory
> on the filesystem
> (--filename=/mnt/ioband1/test.dat, I'm assuming mount
> /dev/mapper/ioband1 on
> /mnt/ioband1),
> am I wright?
>
> Yes, you are right.
> I also think the terms can leave misunderstanding. :)
>
>
> (2) Conditions in RDF sheet
> Conditions in sheet "RDF" and "RBF" are same but results are
> slightly different.
> Should "Mode" in RDF sheet be "Direct"?
>
> As the Report sheet in the file shows,
> "D" in RDF means Direct I/O and "B" in RBF means Buffered I/O(delayed I/O).
> I think the reason for difference in result, especially several
> fluctuation in RBF, is
> related with buffer cache and pdflushd daemon.
> So, generally, I/O bandwidth controll in direct I/O mode is
> more accurate than that of buffered I/O mode.
Alright, I see. Completely no fluctuation in direct write is interesting.
Thank you for the explanation.
Muuhh
--
IKEDA, Munehiro
NEC Corporation of America
m-ikeda-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-31 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 1:46 [Test Result] I/O bandwidth Control by dm-ioband - partition-based environment Dong-Jae Kang
2009-08-27 6:20 ` Ryo Tsuruta
[not found] ` <20090827.152042.104028330.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 11:03 ` Dong-Jae Kang
2009-08-27 11:03 ` Dong-Jae Kang
2009-08-28 10:24 ` Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908280324v32e7ba3fq88eb754052cbf094-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 2:12 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-08-31 2:12 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-08-31 10:08 ` Dong-Jae Kang
2009-09-02 11:18 ` Ryo Tsuruta
[not found] ` <2891419e0908310308w31c46180nce72d271cd947c98-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-02 11:18 ` Ryo Tsuruta
[not found] ` <20090831.111233.226777940.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 10:08 ` Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908270403kd439d29gedeea6fcae753d6d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-28 10:24 ` Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908261846v4fa19791q4552975f10dd64e5-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 6:20 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-08-28 15:58 ` Munehiro Ikeda
[not found] ` <4A97FEC1.1010500-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 7:16 ` Dong-Jae Kang
[not found] ` <2891419e0908310016k7aa8acc6o548c1ce5a31ba2ba-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-31 16:40 ` Munehiro Ikeda [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9BFCFD.6080702@ds.jp.nec.com \
--to=m-ikeda-mdrzhb/z0dd8ursed/g0lq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=baramsori72-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=corsetproject-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ioband-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.