From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: hppa nptl switch Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:08:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4A9CBA44.8040202@aurel32.net> References: <119aab440908181851i174315c6lebacea921046bbb0@mail.gmail.com> <20090819124816.GC2517@hall.aurel32.net> <119aab440908302201s35719b5fh3f7d7b1e870c445f@mail.gmail.com> <119aab440908310810g6fa7e3d8s71f1f4bea0041f1@mail.gmail.com> <200908311846.49969.elendil@planet.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, linux-parisc To: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200908311846.49969.elendil@planet.nl> Resent-Message-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Frans Pop a =E9crit : > Carlos O'Donell wrote: >>> In practice it shouldn't be problem at all. >>> Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled >>> against NPTL-hppa-glibc will require NPTL-hppa-glibc >>> by proper Depends: line like "libc6 (>=3D 2.10)". >> Does every package have to do this? I'm not very familiar with all the >> packaging requirements. >=20 > It is something that should automatically get done correctly as long as= =20 > the libc-dev package defines the minimum version that way. >=20 > The mechanism that determines this is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlib= s.=20 > Currently this has lines like: > libc 6 libc6 (>=3D 2.9) >=20 No, as glibc uses symbols files, this file is actually not used. Nevertheless it is still possible to resolve all symbols to libc6 (>=3D 2= .10). --=20 Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net --=20 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian= .org