From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Nested VMX patch 1 implements vmon and vmoff Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:39:09 +0300 Message-ID: <4A9FC6FD.3040603@redhat.com> References: <1251905916-2834-1-git-send-email-oritw@il.ibm.com> <1251905916-2834-2-git-send-email-oritw@il.ibm.com> <4A9EC8E2.6080703@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Abel Gordon , aliguori@us.ibm.com, Ben-Ami Yassour1 , kvm@vger.kernel.org, mmday@us.ibm.com, Muli Ben-Yehuda To: Orit Wasserman Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33784 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754772AbZICNjO (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:39:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/03/2009 03:34 PM, Orit Wasserman wrote: > >> I think we need to mask it with the capabilities we support. Otherwise >> the guest can try to use some new feature which we don't support yet, >> and crash. >> > I agree , but I went over the Intel spec and didn't find any problematic > feature. > We may need to consider it in the future. > We need to do it, since we don't know anything about future processors. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function