From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] slub: Fix kmem_cache_destroy() with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:18:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9FD047.9000002@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020909030705x7909cf07w7ea0d3662a66c5cc@mail.gmail.com>
Pekka Enberg a écrit :
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> Oh, sure, the fix looks sane to me. It's just that I am a complete
>>> coward when it comes to merging RCU related patches so I always try to
>>> fish an Acked-by from Paul or Christoph ;).
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Christoph
> Lameter<cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> I am fine with acking the poison piece.
>
> Ok.
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Christoph
> Lameter<cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> I did not ack the patch that added rcu to kmem_cache_destroy() and I
>> likely wont ack that piece either.
>
> Right. I didn't remember that I merged that over your NAK but I don't
> share your view that kmem_cache_destroy() callers should do
> rcu_barrier() or whatever is necessary if we can do it from
> kmem_cache_destroy(). So I am happy to take both changes but I would
> appreciate them being split into two separate patches.
>
Here is the second patch (RCU thing). Stable candidate
[PATCH] slub: Fix kmem_cache_destroy() with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
kmem_cache_destroy() should call rcu_barrier() *after* kmem_cache_close()
and *before* sysfs_slab_remove() or risk rcu_free_slab()
being called after kmem_cache is deleted (kfreed).
rmmod nf_conntrack can crash the machine because it has to
kmem_cache_destroy() a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU enabled cache.
Reported-by: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index b9f1491..b627675 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2594,8 +2594,6 @@ static inline int kmem_cache_close(struct kmem_cache *s)
*/
void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
{
- if (s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)
- rcu_barrier();
down_write(&slub_lock);
s->refcount--;
if (!s->refcount) {
@@ -2606,6 +2604,8 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
"still has objects.\n", s->name, __func__);
dump_stack();
}
+ if (s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)
+ rcu_barrier();
sysfs_slab_remove(s);
} else
up_write(&slub_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-11 12:42 System freeze on reboot - general protection fault Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-11 14:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-11 14:52 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-11 15:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-11 15:32 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-11 15:48 ` Robin Holt
2009-08-11 21:10 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-12 22:16 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-12 22:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-13 17:09 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-14 9:33 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-16 9:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-08-17 14:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-09-02 21:45 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-02 22:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-02 22:31 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 1:04 ` [PATCH] slub: fix slab_pad_check() and SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 6:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-03 6:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-03 7:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 7:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 7:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-03 17:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 14:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-03 14:18 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-09-03 19:48 ` [PATCH] slub: Fix kmem_cache_destroy() with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU Pekka Enberg
2009-09-03 19:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 19:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 17:45 ` [PATCH] slub: fix slab_pad_check() and SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 14:08 ` [PATCH] slub: fix slab_pad_check() Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 18:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 15:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-03 15:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 19:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-03 22:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 22:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-04 15:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 22:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 22:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 22:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-04 15:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-04 20:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-04 20:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-04 15:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 19:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-03 22:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-03 23:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-04 15:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-04 20:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-08 19:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 22:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-08 22:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 22:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-09 14:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 14:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-09 14:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 15:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-03 19:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-03 15:00 ` [PATCH] slub: fix slab_pad_check() and SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-03 13:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-03 13:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-03 13:28 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 13:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 13:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-03 14:35 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 14:35 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 18:17 ` System freeze on reboot - general protection fault Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-03 18:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9FD047.9000002@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hawk@comx.dk \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.