From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752743AbZIGKG5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2009 06:06:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752587AbZIGKG4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2009 06:06:56 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:49485 "EHLO mail-yx0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752570AbZIGKGz (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2009 06:06:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pD/JF2z//BCvAGrlTDJ4l8cN5iUCV7tOllIJvd+JBBUa0DgUBRW7nqsM73MXe9RGwg TkZq4V/ZBnxrYXwRw5xJEVzcndYlgacPofbBfaLjIMLIqtoFKxFs92CljBthLvYuxhFE Kc5B4msKKlXDcFD+9aACGo+OLJbuF7/TNl/Bo= Message-ID: <4AA4DB42.1000800@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:06:58 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 SUSE/3.0b3-8.4 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Nigel Cunningham , linux-pm , LKML , TuxOnIce-devel Subject: Re: What to do? References: <4A8CCF95.9030401@crca.org.au> <200908240004.16769.rjw@sisk.pl> <4A91CBB9.1080702@crca.org.au> <200908240120.30776.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200908240120.30776.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi again. On 08/24/2009 01:20 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 24 August 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> We should start by asking where you're at as far as knowledge of swsusp >> and TuxOnIce goes. Well, I know swsups a bit and don't know about toi much. Still I think it's not a problem at all. I learn quickly ;). >> I know you've been around the TuxOnIce lists a bit, >> but don't know how much you know about C programming or the inards of >> the kernel, swsusp or TuxOnIce (ie how much help do you need to get up >> to speed?). I think C is no problem at all, so the kernel. The two I mentioned above. I think I'll need no or low help from your side regarding the code site. From what I've read already I would say it's well documented. > Well, if you start from something that people don't like, it may be difficult > to push the rest. > > Still, I think Jiri is more than capable of handling that, so more or less > everything that is a clear improvement and doesn't introduce regressions of any > kind will probably work for me. Thank you guys. I needed to cope with other things (a suspend regression, writable /proc//limits etc.) which took me a long time, sorry. Then I also went through the last "discussion" around the last merge try mainly to see what others think about kernel-side implementation of compression etc. I hope I'll come up with something early. Thanks.