From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751557AbZIHRd2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:33:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751571AbZIHRd1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:33:27 -0400 Received: from mailhost.ics.forth.gr ([139.91.157.55]:38712 "EHLO mailhost.ics.forth.gr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751517AbZIHRd0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:33:26 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 586 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:33:26 EDT X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mailhost.ics.forth.gr n88HNdhi011050 X-AuditID: 8b5b9d37-a0cc3bb000007f62-05-4aa6931a1759 Message-ID: <4AA69319.7070004@ics.forth.gr> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:23:37 +0300 From: Manolis Marazakis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Manolis Marazakis Subject: availability of the FileMark benchmark? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I am writing to inquire about the availability of the FileMark benchmark, as described in the paper "Filesystem Performance and Scalability in Linux 2.4.17" (Freenix Track at USENIX Annual Technical Conference, 2002). It does not appear in /filemark.sf.net, which the reference given in this paper./ FileMark caught my eye, as I have been thinking about a multi-threaded variant of the PostMark benchmark. Best regards, Manolis Marazakis. -- Research and Development Engineer, Computer Architecture and VLSI Systems Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), 100, Nikolaou Plastira Ave, Vassilika Vouton, Heraklion, Greece GR-70013.