All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maurice Hilarius <maurice@harddata.com>
To: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, iusty@k1024.org
Subject: Re: mdadm and TLER (Time Limited Error Recovery)
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:33:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA70604.7020709@harddata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090908184837.GA28217@teal.hq.k1024.org>

Iustin Pop wrote:
> ..
>> Anyways, clarification...
>> The only reason for TLER (Time Limited Error Recovery) is to behave
>> "friendly" toward RAID controllers that timeout disks.
>> In fact, md does not timeout disks as many Hardware RAID controllers do.
>> So, from md's point of view, TLER is useless, i.e. it has no benefit.
>>     
>
> I'm sorry but I disagree here. *Especially* because md is used over
> normal SATA controllers most of the time, TLER is beneficial because the
> drive doesn't go catatonic for minutes at a time trying to recover a bad
> sector, which would (because md doesn't timeout disks) cause md to hung
> up the whole device. TLER will allow md to see the error quickly and
> attempt to rewrite (read) or retry/fail the disk (write) for a bad the
> sector.
>
> Just my understanding of the md stack.
>
> regards,
> iustin
>
>   
I agree.
Before WD implemented this we would see cases quite often where a 
perfectly good drive would get "kicked out"
of a RAID as frequently or even more often, than on a hardware RAID.
TLER management seems to have eliminated most of these cases.



-- 
Regards, Maurice

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-09  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-08  0:35 mdadm and TLER (Time Limited Error Recovery) Tim Rutter
2009-09-08 14:17 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-08 18:48   ` Iustin Pop
2009-09-08 19:45     ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-09  1:33     ` Maurice Hilarius [this message]
2009-09-09  8:21       ` Simon Jackson
2009-09-09  9:00         ` Majed B.
2009-09-09 11:04         ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-10  9:26           ` Simon Jackson
2009-09-10  9:39             ` Majed B.
2009-09-10  9:46             ` Robin Hill
2009-09-15 15:36           ` Simon Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AA70604.7020709@harddata.com \
    --to=maurice@harddata.com \
    --cc=Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE \
    --cc=iusty@k1024.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.