From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4AA799AD.9070402@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:03:57 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <793108.19562.qm@domain.hid> <4AA691B8.4090204@domain.hid> <394564.56258.qm@domain.hid> <4AA6D85C.8040707@domain.hid> <982599.63991.qm@domain.hid> <4AA6DE47.8010804@domain.hid> <934774.26170.qm@domain.hid> <4AA77F8D.3090709@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4AA77F8D.3090709@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] RT Task RPC over a POSIX/Native Queue List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Jan Kiszka wrote: > As you do not care about determinism of the network communication, you > also do not need RTnet. It would only introduce the risk that non-RT > network participant overload your box. And this load would show up in > the RT domain because RTnet would have to handle it. You can solve that by limiting the non real-time traffic to a maximum rate, and always keep some bandwidth for the real-time traffic. This is a bit more complicated than nomac, but not that much. But of course if you do not need packets to be sent ASAP, I agree that rtnet is overkill. -- Gilles