From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753207AbZIIOZZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:25:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752434AbZIIOZY (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:25:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26035 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751971AbZIIOZY (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:25:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4AA7BACD.2090601@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:25:17 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu CC: Beth Kon , rostedt@goodmis.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Wierdness - linux-next KVM patch breaks Dell Latitude D820, KVM not in kernel References: <3850.1252332427@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <4AA65CFE.50402@us.ibm.com> <22130.1252438888@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <22130.1252438888@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/08/2009 10:41 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > Yeah, I was quite confused by the bisect results as well, I may end up > re-doing it just to make sure I didn't screw something up along the way (since > I started it with -rc7/HEAD as the good/bad, but most of the resulting > kernels reported a pre-rc7 release (a 2.6.28 at one point, IIRC, and it > finished at 31-rc2. > This is normal, if a branch based on 2.6.28 was merged into 2.6.31-rc a bisect may detour through that branch and generate that version. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function