From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP regression with packets rates < 10k per sec
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:08:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA7E0FA.5070005@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909091234360.15538@V090114053VZO-1>
Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Christoph Lameter a ?crit :
>>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
>>>> In order to reproduce this here, could you tell me if you use
>>>>
>>>> Producer linux-2.6.22 -> Receiver 2.6.22
>>>> Producer linux-2.6.31 -> Receiver 2.6.31
>>> I use the above setup.
>> Then frames are sent on wire but not received
>>
>> (they are received via mc loop, internal stack magic)
>
> We are talking about two machines running 2.6.22 or 2.6.31. There is no
> magic mc loop between the two machines. -L was not used.
>
I have no idea how you run the test then, and how are computed time deltas.
Are you clocks synchronized to less than one us ? How is it done ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 22:38 UDP regression with packets rates < 10k per sec Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 22:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-09 14:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-09 16:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 17:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-09 17:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-10 20:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-10 21:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-10 21:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-10 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-14 21:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-15 5:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-15 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-15 17:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-15 20:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-15 19:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-25 14:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-26 16:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-10 21:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 17:08 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-09-09 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA7E0FA.5070005@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.