From: Mick Jordan <Mick.Jordan@Sun.COM>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Size limit on extra argument to xm create
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:49:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA8772C.5060601@Sun.COM> (raw)
Experimentally there seems to be a 1024 byte limit on the size of the
extra parameter to xm create (shades of csh!).
Before I dig in to the code, I'm thought I'd check if this a limit in xm
or a more fundamental limit in the Xen guest interface. I can imagine a
hard limit of a page in the latter case, but that would be a lot better
than 1024.
Thanks
Mick
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-10 3:49 Mick Jordan [this message]
2009-09-10 4:00 ` Size limit on extra argument to xm create; RETRACT Mick Jordan
2009-10-09 19:57 ` Size limit on extra argument to xm create Mick Jordan
2009-10-09 20:31 ` Keir Fraser
2009-10-09 22:32 ` Mick Jordan
2009-10-10 6:30 ` Keir Fraser
2009-10-12 17:05 ` Mick Jordan
2009-10-12 17:15 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA8772C.5060601@Sun.COM \
--to=mick.jordan@sun.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.