Reimar Döffinger wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> =?UTF-8?q?Reimar=20D=C3=B6ffinger?= wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger >>> --- >>> hw/vmport.c | 2 ++ >>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/hw/vmport.c b/hw/vmport.c >>> index 884af3f..9a942ee 100644 >>> --- a/hw/vmport.c >>> +++ b/hw/vmport.c >>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ >>> #include "isa.h" >>> #include "pc.h" >>> #include "sysemu.h" >>> +#include "kvm.h" >>> >>> //#define VMPORT_DEBUG >>> >>> @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ static uint32_t vmport_ioport_read(void *opaque, uint32_t addr) >>> unsigned char command; >>> uint32_t eax; >>> >>> + cpu_synchronize_state(env); >>> eax = env->regs[R_EAX]; >>> if (eax != VMPORT_MAGIC) >>> return eax; >> Ack (qemu-kvm carries a similar patch). > > Now that I look at it... yes. > Except that it does not yet have cpu_synchronize_state and thus is broken for > vmport_ioport_write, the return value written to EAX is lost. Normally qemu-kvm catches such things when merging from upstream. > >> But please grant your patches some proper titles. > > Sorry, I am still figuring out how to write commit messages that git format-patch > handles in a good way (as well as the most sane way to use it in > general). This rule is simple, just write your commit messages in the form Title Description... Moreover, your mail client is configured to inject "Mail-Followup-To" into your postings. This quickly causes troubles. E.g., it suggested my client to send myself a mail when replying to yours. Jan