Re: [PATCH 0/4] Support "-t nfs,vers=4" mounts in the kernel [take 4]

[Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>]

On 09/09/2009 01:31 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:51 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> On 09/02/2009 09:51 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Sorry for the repost.  After reading the patch descriptions again, I
>>> thought they needed some clarification.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Chuck Lever (4):
>>>       NFS: Allow the "nfs" file system type to support NFSv4
>>>       NFS: Move details of nfs4_get_sb() to a helper
>>>       NFS: Refactor NFSv4 text-based mount option validation
>>>       NFS: Mount option parser should detect missing "port="
>>>
>>>
>>>  fs/nfs/internal.h    |   10 ++
>>>  fs/nfs/super.c       |  202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>  include/linux/nfs4.h |    1 These patches (after a bit of back porting) are now in the F-12 and Rawhide 
kernels, 
>>>  3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Trond,
>>
>> I'm updating the mount.nfs man pages, and would like give 
>> an guess-ta-mate as to which kernel these patches will be in.
>> Any ideas?
> 
> I'm planning on pushing them out in the upcoming merge window, since the
> patches themselves seem pretty straightforward. I've applied the fixes
> that I suggested, and added the patch to disable vers!=4 in the '-t
> nfs4' case.
> 
> If you'd like to test it all out, I've pushed those patches into the
> nfs-for-2.6.32 branch of my git tree. They should also appear in
> linux-next.
After a weekend of testing these patches along with Chunk's mount.nfs 
patches, I committed these patches (after some back porting) to both 
the Fedora F-12 and Rawhide kernels, which means they will get plenty 
of testing by the time 2.6.32 rolls around...

steved.