From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] cld: implement dynamic port
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:19:41 -0400
Message-ID: <4AB012FD.3040502@garzik.org>
References: <20090902204858.7a3e34a9@redhat.com>	<4AA7FBA0.9090307@garzik.org> <20090914121511.4dc5033e@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090914121511.4dc5033e@redhat.com>
Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <hail-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Cc: Project Hail List <hail-devel@vger.kernel.org>

On 09/14/2009 02:15 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:01:52 -0400, Jeff Garzik<jeff@garzik.org>  wrote:
>
>> though for uniformity, I lean towards thinking that the daemon should
>> always write a port file, regardless of whether the port was manually
>> specified or automatically bound.
>
> I have a better idea. Let's split PortFile from the enabling
> of auto ports. We can have<Port>  to with a special string "auto",
> and let<PortFile>  to be set when static port is configured.

I think that's fair...

	Jeff