From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marc - A. Dahlhaus" Subject: Re: Announcing xen/master: pvops git trees rearranged Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:36:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4AB4B439.7020001@wol.de> References: <4AB431AD.1030205@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AB431AD.1030205@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Xen-devel , =?UTF-8?B?UGFzaSBLw6Rya2vDpA==?= List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hello Jeremy, Jeremy Fitzhardinge schrieb: > Well, my current pvops/dom0 tree is finally (reasonably) stable. There > was a fairly nasty bug which ended up corrupting dom0 memory when doing > IO on behalf of domains, but that is finally fixed. > > In honour of this, I've renamed the rebase/* branches to xen/* (moving > the old remaining xen/* branches to xen-old/*); xen/master is now the > preferred branch for fetching current dom0 work. > > The kernel tree is fairly featureful: > > * basic dom0 support > * blkback > * netback > * ACPI power management > * S3 suspend/resume (at least for some people) > * microcode update > * MSI support > > In other words, it has as much as it ever has. waited for MSI, will give it a try :o) > There are a few notable missing features: > > * blktap2 > * netchannel2 > * pci front/back > * upstream Linux support > * your pet feature > > > Full coordinates are: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git xen/master Is HEAD already pointing to xen/master or do i have to change branches? > See http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps for general > directions on configuration, compilation and use. I think it would be a good idea to add some backtrace and debug related options to the CONFIG_ options listed on the wiki page so that one gets all the details needed from the testers when some bug shows up (CCd Pasi). The NETXEN_NIC option looks unrelated to xen... > This is definitely a work-in-progress kernel. I'd appreciate all bug > *and* success reports so I can get some idea of how many people are > using this thing, and how often there are problems. Patches gratefully > accepted. Will report something back soon, Marc