From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72CFB70B3 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:36:02 +1000 (EST) Received: from de01smr02.am.mot.com (de01smr02.freescale.net [10.208.0.151]) by az33egw02.freescale.net (8.14.3/az33egw02) with ESMTP id n8LMZxJx011651 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:35:59 -0700 (MST) Received: from az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net (az33exm25.am.freescale.net [10.64.32.16]) by de01smr02.am.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n8LMcBHP020509 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:38:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4AB7FFE9.8050206@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:36:25 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew L. Creech" Subject: Re: NAND partition names in DTS must be named "partition"? References: <5ee96a840909211527g45b47b3fgff907df69fe48666@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ee96a840909211527g45b47b3fgff907df69fe48666@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Matthew L. Creech wrote: > I upgraded from 2.6.29 to 2.6.31, and the kernel no longer recognized > the partitions embedded within my DTS file. I had to revert this > change: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4b08e149c0e02e97ec49c2a31d14a0d3a02f8074 > > in order to boot. This code looks like it expects all partitions to > be named "partition", otherwise they're just skipped. Is there some > peculiarity in my setup that makes this not work, or is it a general > problem? I see no major differences between my DTS file and the > stardard "mpc8313erdb.dts". It looks like mpc8313erdb.dts needs to be updated. That, and Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/mtd-physmap.txt, which still says, "Each node's name represents the name of the corresponding partition of the flash device," and has examples whose names are not "partition". :-P -Scott