From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: rdtscP and xen (and maybe the app-tsc answer I've been looking for) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:18:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4AB94D1D.30706@goop.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Dan Magenheimer Cc: kurt.hackel@oracle.com, "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" , Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/22/09 13:22, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > The reason is to improve performance while preserving > correctness for applications that need to do tens-to-hundreds > of thousands "timestamp reads" without changing the underlying > OS. Whether this is a GOOD reason is subject to interpretation, > but it is a reason. > I don't think there's anything new to add to this line of discussion. J