From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: newer dom0 kernel / xen-unstable git kernel tree Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:28:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4AB95DB8.9020801@goop.org> References: <20090922121009.GX31123@reaktio.net> <200909221444.19271.joost@antarean.org> <20090922134403.GZ31123@reaktio.net> <6b7f6eb0909220649l23d4f14fga7dae1eb0303a0f7@mail.gmail.com> <20090922135909.GA31123@reaktio.net> <6b7f6eb0909221626p48d1e7a7w5fe1dfaba54d02da@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6b7f6eb0909221626p48d1e7a7w5fe1dfaba54d02da@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro Cc: "J. Roeleveld" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/22/09 16:26, Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro wrote: > Gotcha! > > To make use of the latest pv_ops dom0 need I the xen-unstable tree? > Or can I use the Xen 3.4.1 / 3.3.2 from xen.org ? There's no close tie between dom0 and Xen itself; it should work with any fairly recent version of Xen (and if it doesn't that's interesting information). J