From: will <whansard@sbcglobal.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: disk speed regression kernel 2.6.29 and after
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:08:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ABA0FDA.9090707@sbcglobal.net> (raw)
I had been using an old 2.6.22 kernel on my machine, and I often backup one partition
of my main hard drive to a partition on a second hard drive. The main hard drive is
sata 640 gigs, and the second is a pata 320 gig. copying this partition from one
drive to the other with dd takes about 3 minutes and 30 seconds. When I installed
kernel 2.6.30, and 2.6.31, the time took 9 minutes and 20 seconds. I decided to go to
the trouble of compiling all the kernels between, and kernels 2.6.22-2.6.28 all do
the operation in about 3 minutes and 30 seconds. 2.6.29- newer all take about 9
minutes and 20 seconds. The partition is 16 gigs. each drive seems to be as fast as
before otherwise, it's just much slower copying from one drive to another, which I do
very often. This is an nforce 3 based motherboard, amd southbridge, i think, with 4
gigs of ram, athlon 64x2. 32 bit kernel. has anyone heard of this problem?
I currently have 3 hard drives hooked up.
a 200 gig on a promise controller,
a 320 gig on the amd pata?
a 640 sata on the nv i think.
The motherboard is a Asrock-AM2NF3-VSTA
copying this partition with dd or cat or schily's dd between any of these 3
different hard drives takes different times depending on the speed of the drive with
kernels 2.6.22-2.6.28, but takes about 9 minutes and 30 seconds on any of the drives
with the kernels 2.6.29 and after.
Please cc me with any followups or anything. thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-23 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-23 12:08 will [this message]
2009-09-23 12:23 ` disk speed regression kernel 2.6.29 and after Jon Smirl
2009-09-24 3:06 ` Will
2009-09-24 9:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-24 3:07 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-24 4:35 ` Will
2009-09-24 7:44 ` odie
2009-09-24 9:01 ` Will
2009-09-24 10:41 ` Will
2009-09-24 12:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-09-24 16:26 ` Will
2009-09-24 17:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-09-24 18:11 ` Frans Pop
2009-09-24 19:12 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-09-24 21:50 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-24 21:34 Andrew Randrianasulu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ABA0FDA.9090707@sbcglobal.net \
--to=whansard@sbcglobal.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.