From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: sync guest calls made async on host - SQLite performance Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:58:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4AC258C4.9030001@codemonkey.ws> References: <4ABA45BE.1080008@gmail.com> <4ABB5BAD.3000007@redhat.com> <4ABB6E07.60909@redhat.com> <4ABC6FC5.6080007@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Tippett Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.221.174]:62394 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752639AbZI2TFY (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:05:24 -0400 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so4233139qyk.33 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:05:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Matthew Tippett wrote: > First up, Phoronix hasn't tuned. It's observing the delivered state > by an OS vendor. I started with what I believe to be the starting > point - KVM. > > So the position of the KVM now is that it is either QEMU's > configuration or Ubuntu's configuration. No further guidance or > suggestions? Note that the prevailing response here does not see the > 10 fold sqlite performance with guest vs host as a problem. > Again, this isn't a problem. Ubuntu updated to a newer package and the problem has long been resolved upstream. Regards, Anthony Liguori